🧪 V1 Results
V1 Prototype Results
The initial V1 material formed a semi-flexible sheet after 24 hours of drying. The structure showed uneven thickness distribution, with certain regions exhibiting rubber-like flexibility under compression while other areas remained thin and fragile.
V1 Key Observations
- Inconsistent thickness across the surface
- Uneven drying patterns
- Localized flexibility instead of uniform elasticity
- Minor structural fragility in thin regions
V1 → V2 Comparison
V1 served as a baseline prototype used to identify structural inconsistencies and guide iterative improvements in V2 development. This comparison highlights how controlled adjustments in processing variables directly influenced material consistency and performance.
V2 Improvements
Based on V1 analysis, several controlled adjustments were made to improve material uniformity and structural performance. These changes focused on:
- Increasing control over heating duration to stabilize gel formation
- Improving mixing intensity for more uniform distribution
- Adjusting drying conditions to reduce edge inconsistencies
- Reducing weak structural zones across the material surface
Expected Outcome
A more uniform biodegradable sheet with consistent thickness distribution, improved elasticity balance, and reduced brittle regions across the material surface.
Create Your Own Website With Webador