📊 Velora Lab: Results & Comparison

This page presents a structured comparison of material performance across V1–V4 prototypes. The goal is to identify trends in flexibility, strength, and structural consistency as processing variables are adjusted over time.

📈 V1–V4 Performance Comparison

Version

Structure Type

Flexibility

Strength

Uniformity

Key Issue

V1

Thin brittle film

Low

Low

Low

Cracking, uneven drying

V2

Flexible film

High

Medium-low

Medium

Thickness inconsistency

V3

Semi-stable sheet

Medium

Medium-low

Medium

Minor stress fractures

V4

Gel-like bulk structure

Medium

Low-medium

Low-medium

Weak internal bonding

🔬 Key Trends Observed

  • Flexibility increased significantly from V1 → V2
  • Structural strength peaked at V3 before decreasing in V4
  • Uniformity remains the most persistent limitation across all versions
  • V4 represents a shift from film formation to bulk gel behavior
  • Drying consistency strongly influences cracking and stability

📊 Performance Insight

Improvements in flexibility are strongly linked to mixing and heating consistency, while structural strength is more sensitive to drying behavior and material thickness.

V4 demonstrates that increasing thickness alone does not improve strength and may reduce structural stability if internal bonding is uneven.

🧠 Interpretation Summary

Overall, the progression from V1 to V4 shows that material performance is driven more by processing conditions than ingredient composition.

While flexibility improves early in the iteration cycle, maintaining strength and uniformity remains the main limiting factor.

🚀 Key Conclusion From Results

  • The material system is highly sensitive to thickness and drying conditions
  • Structural consistency is the main limiting factor across all prototypes
  • V3 represents the best balance between flexibility and strength
  • V4 marks a transition into a different material behavior state rather than a direct improvement