๐Ÿงช Velora Lab: Experiment Log

This page documents the iterative development of a starch-based biodegradable material through controlled experiments. Each version (V1–V4) represents a specific change in processing conditions and its effect on structure formation.


๐Ÿงช V1 Prototype

๐Ÿ”ฌ Observations

  • Thin, brittle film formed after drying
  • Uneven structure with weak cohesion
  • Breaks easily under minimal force
  • Localized rubber-like regions under compression

๐Ÿง  Summary

V1 represents the baseline material. It successfully forms a film but lacks structural stability and flexibility.


๐Ÿงช V2 Prototype

๐Ÿ”ฌ Observations

  • Continuous biodegradable film formed
  • Increased flexibility compared to V1
  • Can bend and fold without immediate failure
  • Tears under stronger force
  • Slight thickness inconsistency remains

๐Ÿ“Š Performance Summary

  • Flexibility: High
  • Brittleness: Low
  • Uniformity: Medium
  • Strength: Medium-low

๐Ÿง  Summary

V2 improves flexibility and cohesion, but inconsistencies in thickness and drying remain.


๐Ÿงช V3 Prototype

๐Ÿ”ฌ Observations

  • More cohesive and stable sheet formation
  • Improved resistance to bending and deformation
  • Withstands light stress without breaking
  • Cracks only under strong force
  • Minor thickness variation still present

๐Ÿง  Summary

V3 shows improved structural integrity, behaving more like a flexible polymer film. However, uniformity and internal stress distribution are still limiting factors.


๐Ÿงช V4 Prototype

๐Ÿ”ฌ Observations

  • Thick, gel-like structure formed using a petri dish mold
  • Soft, rubber-like consistency with deformation under pressure
  • No residue on contact
  • Breaks under moderate force
  • More contained and shaped structure than earlier versions

๐Ÿง  Summary

V4 represents a transition from thin film behavior to bulk gel behavior. Shape control improved, but mechanical strength decreased due to internal structural instability.


๐Ÿง  Overall Insight

Across all versions, material changes were driven primarily by processing conditions rather than composition alone, including:

  • spreading consistency
  • thickness control
  • drying conditions
  • mold usage (e.g., petri dish in V4)

๐Ÿ”ฌ Key Takeaway

The progression from V1 to V4 demonstrates that processing conditions play a critical role in determining material structure and mechanical behavior, sometimes more than ingredient composition.